Location: Welcome to the HP Digital Photography Blog

Discussion: HP Digital Cameras vs, HP Plug-insReported This is a featured thread

Showing 3 posts

springsounds
HP Digital Cameras vs, HP Plug-ins
Apr 5 2008, 8:39 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 5 2008, 8:39 PM EDT
I was at Preclick site and they were annoucing their new plug in, Preclick IPM .
Paraphrasing this. That is better than HP Video Cameras.
What do you think? And what do most HP Community use?
Any comments are appreciated.
Jane
PS: you may e-mail at:ladybirdinsyr@verizon.net
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
suemartin
suemartin
1. RE: HP Digital Cameras vs, HP Plug-ins
Apr 8 2008, 10:59 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 8 2008, 10:59 PM EDT
I'm confused by the "that is better than HP Video Cameras" statement. HP made digital cameras with some limited video functions. Cn you clarify your question?
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Angelal22
Angelal22
2. RE: HP Digital Cameras vs, HP Plug-ins
Apr 9 2008, 11:04 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 9 2008, 11:04 PM EDT
Hi Jane: Are you referring to Internet Photo Messenger (IPM)?
I'm unaware of Video Instant Messaging...
Would be happy to discuss when we better understand your question.
Thanks!
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)